Skip to content
The Cost
/Federal Government

Schedule F strips ~8,000 workers' protections

At-will reclassification covers senior policy-role civil servants across regulatory agencies.

StatusIn effectImpactSignificant · 3/5Sources5CorrectedSep 29, 2026

Key facts

  • ~8,000 positions reclassified in June 2026 (OPM had estimated 50,000)
  • OPM finalized regulations Feb 2026
  • Covers GS-15 and equivalent policy-influencing positions

Summary

President Trump's executive order on January 20, 2025, "Restoring Accountability to Policy-Influencing Positions Within the Federal Workforce," reinstated and expanded Schedule F (renamed Schedule Policy/Career), which OPM estimated could strip civil service protections from about 50,000 federal employees in senior and policy-adjacent roles. A June 2026 executive order moved nearly 8,000 positions into the new schedule.

What happened

Originally created and then rescinded in 2020-2021, the restored order reclassifies GS-15 and equivalent positions deemed "policy-influencing" into an excepted service category, removing standard adverse action procedures and Merit Systems Protection Board appeal rights. OPM finalized implementing regulations in February 2026, formally designating these workers as at-will employees. OPM initially estimated the change would cover about 50,000 positions, roughly 2% of the federal workforce; the positions actually moved in June 2026 numbered nearly 8,000, nearly all at the GS-15 level.

Impact on the United States

Career civil servants in senior analytical, scientific, regulatory, and enforcement roles face dismissal for policy disagreement rather than performance. This fundamentally weakens the non-partisan character of the federal workforce and exposes regulatory and enforcement functions to political interference. The change makes it significantly easier to replace expert career officials with political loyalists.

Documented effects

  1. OPM issued final regulations implementing Schedule Policy/Career in February 2026, removing statutory adverse-action procedures and MSPB appeal rights for positions placed in the new schedule; the announcement did not say how many positions would be moved.[3]
  2. The June 2026 list of reclassified positions spans the executive branch: the Defense Department listed the most position codes (more than 1,600), followed by Homeland Security (571) and Health and Human Services (400); roles include division heads, program managers and officials overseeing spending and grants.[5][4]
  3. A June 3, 2026 executive order moved nearly 8,000 positions, nearly all at the GS-15 level, into Schedule Policy/Career - far below OPM's initial estimate of 50,000.[4][5]

Why this is rated significant

Removes standard adverse-action procedures and MSPB appeal rights from about 8,000 policy-role positions (OPM had estimated up to 50,000), a structural change to the merit system though dismissals are not yet at full scale.

Corrections & updates [8]

Every change to a fact on this page after publication is logged here, newest first.

  1. CorrectedSource

    The NPR source was listed under the wrong headline; its published title is "Thousands of federal workers would be easier to fire under Trump rule change."[2]

  2. CorrectedFigure

    The February 2026 final rule did not itself remove appeal rights from a set number of employees; the OPM announcement gives no count. The 50,000 (about 2% of the workforce) figure was OPM's initial estimate, not an outside experts' estimate. When positions were actually moved in June 2026, the number was nearly 8,000.[1][3][4]

  3. UpdatedFigure

    A June 3, 2026 executive order moved nearly 8,000 positions, nearly all at the GS-15 level, into Schedule Policy/Career - far below OPM's initial estimate of 50,000. The administration has not ruled out expanding the list.[4][5]

  4. CorrectedKey facts

    The claim that the order applies to staff at EPA, FDA and SEC was not supported by the cited NPR article. The White House list published in June 2026 shows the Defense Department reclassifying the most position codes (more than 1,600), followed by Homeland Security (571) and Health and Human Services (400).[4][5]

  5. CorrectedSummary card

    The summary card said the order reclassified tens of thousands of career civil servants. OPM had estimated about 50,000 positions could be covered, but the June 3, 2026 order moved nearly 8,000 positions, nearly all at the GS-15 level, into Schedule Policy/Career (NPR, Federal News Network).[4][5][3]

    + Show previous and current text
    Previously
    Trump reinstated Schedule F on inauguration day, reclassifying tens of thousands of career civil servants including scientists, regulators, and enforcement specialists as at-will employees removable without cause.
    Now
    Trump reinstated Schedule F on inauguration day. OPM estimated it could cover about 50,000 positions, but the June 2026 order moved nearly 8,000, nearly all at the GS-15 level, into an at-will category without standard adverse-action procedures or MSPB appeal rights.
  6. ClarifiedSeverity rationale

    The severity rationale said the change 'structurally weakens the merit system'; it now describes what the change removes. Severity unchanged.

    + Show previous and current text
    Previously
    Strips civil-service protections from about 8,000 policy-role positions (OPM had estimated up to 50,000), structurally weakening the merit system though dismissals are not yet at full scale.
    Now
    Removes standard adverse-action procedures and MSPB appeal rights from about 8,000 policy-role positions (OPM had estimated up to 50,000), a structural change to the merit system though dismissals are not yet at full scale.
  7. ClarifiedSource labels

    Source tier labels brought in line with the site's tier rule (specialist and trade publications are Tier 3; general news organizations are Tier 2): Federal News Network (Tier 2 to 3). No claim in the entry changed.

  8. CorrectedCost estimate

    The Schedule F cost was our own estimate; the only published figure is a think tank's warning that it 'could' cost hundreds of millions of dollars, with no amount or timeframe. The entry now books $0 and says why. It also now says about 8,000 positions were moved (not ~10,000).

    Previously
    $500M so far; $4B 10yr; $6B 15yr
    Now
    $0 (no published estimate)

Sources [5]

Image: John of Reading, CC BY-SA 3.0 (Wikimedia Commons)

View all